363
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
363 points (97.9% liked)
politics
18870 readers
3731 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
At least this rat knows when to jump ship.
Dude has flip flopped so many times over the last 3 years, I'm not sure even he knows what he really believes. His only worthwhile accomplishment is not selling the country down the river in one admittedly important way and I'm pretty positive he wouldn't do the same thing if put in the same scenario again.
I never thought I would say this, but thank God for Dan Quayle. Pence was looking for any excuse not to certify the election results, and Quayle told him flat out that the Vice President didn't have that authority.
I did not know about that. Amazing who turns out to do the right thing. I guess Quayle was so long ago that if his conservative set points didn't change he'd be a liberal now.
Trump supporters don't like him, everyone else doesn't like him. At least he doesn't have a viable presidential bid.
Hopefully the religious right voters that he helped attract to Trump are still listening to him and his denouncement of Trump.
He does not care what you believe of him, as long as you vote for him. He is a politician, after all. OK, a nutty one, even for US standards.
Seriously. Pretty sure most politicians wouldn't be so, let's say"diplomatic", about being the target of an attempted coup.
He was not the target. He was just in the way. Democracy was the target.
Nobody accused him to be smart...