this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
192 points (96.6% liked)

News

36943 readers
2219 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A person with a ticket matching all six Powerball numbers in Saturday’s $1.3 billion jackpot came forward Monday to claim the prize, Oregon officials said.

The lottery ticket was purchased at a Plaid Pantry convenience store in the northeast part of the city, Oregon Lottery said in a statement.

Oregon Lottery is working with the person in a process that involves security measures and vetting that will take time before a winner is announced.

“This is an unprecedented jackpot win for Oregon Lottery,” Oregon Lottery Director Mike Wells said in the statement. “We’re taking every precaution to verify the winner before awarding the prize money.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That is not what habit means.

Going to the movies 5 or 6 times a year is neither settled nor regular.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Now look up tendency. Any number range per year is a regular tendency. Per year is regular, and any nonzero number is tendency. The English language is shit. I before e except after c and several hundred other exceptions.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nonsense. It's entirely relative.

Per year is regular for a medical checkup.

Per year is not regular for eating an egg salad sandwich. Especially when it is an average of once per year and not definitely once per year.

Is getting a medical checkup a habit? If so, is it a vice? Because, again, I don't deny I have habits. I'm denying I have vices.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nothing in the definition says anything about relative. You are applying your interpretation to the definition. But everyone can have a different interpretation. So you can't do that and still be "technically" correct.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are you seriously claiming that having, on average, one egg salad sandwich a year is both a habit and a vice?

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pretty sure I never said anything specific about egg salad. But yeah, English sucks. Technically it is a habit.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, I said something specific about egg salad, on average, once per year and you said it is a habit.

Me:

Per year is not regular for eating an egg salad sandwich. Especially when it is an average of once per year and not definitely once per year.

You:

Nothing in the definition says anything about relative. You are applying your interpretation to the definition. But everyone can have a different interpretation. So you can’t do that and still be “technically” correct.

So basically everything anyone could possibly do from swallowing a thumbtack to dying of listeria is a habit.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I keep trying to tell you that english is a shifty language. I believe you can exclude one time events if you dig into the definitions of the words used in the definition of habit. But that is probably the technical limit of things truely excluded.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I see... So if you eat a plum when you're 6 years old and then never eat another plum again until you're 90, it's not a one-time event, and therefore is a habit and a vice.

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Holy shit the colors of lines aligning with replies are so pretty. It’s 4 full rainbows.🌈

You guys truly have some serious vices of online pointless arguments. How humane of you.

I congratulate you on being just like the rest of us.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes on the habit technically. Thats a once every 45 year habit. But a vice? Well I don't think eating a plum is bad for you unless you are allergic or something. So not a vice I think.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think you will find a single other person on this planet that would agree with you that doing something two times over the course of your entire life is a habit. Not one.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Now that's just silly. Even the most absurd thing one could think of could find one person on the planet that would agree with it.

Now remember, you took this down the "technically" path. I personally would use habit closer in line with how you would. But Vice is similar. The definition says it is a habit, but it is common for people to use it in reference to things that aren't a habit by your interpretation. So you can pick if you want to be technical, or interpretive. But you can't mix and match. Either way, the original point of everyone has a vice is true if you use the technical branch and if you use the interpretive branch. It is only false if you use the interpretive for habit, and the technical for vice.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even the most absurd thing one could think of could find one person on the planet that would agree with it.

Okay, find me that person. I'll wait.

Dr oz.... Donald Trump, any of the maga Republicans...