67
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
67 points (89.4% liked)
Technology
55693 readers
2853 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Meta doesn’t need threads.net to harvest data from ActivityPub instances. In fact, literally anyone can do it without much effort. You’re not protecting your data by being here. It’s as public as old phpbb forums used to be even more so. That bit is a non issue (well, it is an issue…)
My issue is just with the quality of content from meta owned instances and what it’ll bring to other federated instances.
"Protecting your data" is probably a nonsense thing to say. You can't at the same time make a post public and "protect" it from someone copying, reading, or learning from it.
It is theoretically possible to publish in public while protecting information but it requires the added step of maintaining authorization for those you wish to see that data.
You could create a protocol where poster info is encrypted and only the appropriate parties are given the keys to access that information. To the general public it's posted by an anonymous user.
The question to ask is who really cares that much about your posts? Use a VPN and make an alt account and Bob's your Uncle.
There's also the question of the value of that metadata. If something like an email address or phone number was tied to your account in a publicly available fashion that would be one thing as those are relatively unique and can be used to tie back to an individual person. But if all you're getting is a username with nothing else attached that's a lot more nebulous. If you care to obfuscate your activity you could easily just create an account with a name you've never used before. That's probably far more effective at preventing your "data" from being harvested by meta than some kind of encryption scheme would be unless you're willing to go all in on E2E encryption which creates a ton of other problems that would need to be solved.
Exactly. But you can now get burner numbers much easier so obfuscating the meta data outside the service is getting easier. Not perfect but easier.
If you are doing things where you need full on clean room level obfuscation you can never use any type of service outside of your full control. At that point you're talking one time pads and posting messages in the wanted ads of news papers.
I've always assumed every part of the internet to be tracked and logged somehow. What I take issue with is the use of that data to shove targeted ads down my throat at every opportunity.