this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
1478 points (100.0% liked)

196

16511 readers
2306 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1478
rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

FAQ

Q: why not organize and stop treating the bus as a legitimate entity? why aren’t you working to stop the bus?

A: do both. cut the fuel line. break windows. put oatmeal in the gas tank. but maybe your efforts don’t succeed this election cycle. and if so don’t fucking throw away your vote if it can help your neighbors fucking survive. “harm reduction” is not a political strategy for action. it is a last minute, end of the line decision to save lives, after all other resources have been exhausted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

14% of liberals aren’t pro-choice

…excuse me?

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

yep. human worldviews are remarkably diverse and often don’t rigidly conform to our expectations. browsing through gallup data is a good reminder every once in a while.

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes but… isn’t the whole point of liberalism “personal liberty above everything, keep regulations to the extreme minimum”? To me that feels like a vegan that randomly decides eating one type of meat is ok.

Re-reading the survey, if the options were only Conservative, Moderate and Liberal I can understand why some leftwing religious people would choose that, but it still feels weird to me.

Like, in my mind the opposite of Conservative is Progressive, not Liberal. That’s the opposite of Authoritarian.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Isn't Christianity about treating your neighbours well, and about how God loves everyone?

[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] tb_@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I guess. Mainly wanted to highlight that "claimed ideology" isn't the same as "actual ideology".

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Kinda? The thing is that Christianity is a 2000+ year old “ideology” that isn’t even consistent with itself, so it’s a given that their followers pick and choose which parts they want to adhere to.

I expected more coherence from a philosophy that’s barely 400 years old but apparently that’s still too much I guess.