this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
178 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
408 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
178
Are We Watching The Internet Die? (www.wheresyoured.at)
submitted 8 months ago by Gaywallet@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

Yup - federated communities grow specially well in a corporate landscape. However my concern is if they're able to stay dominant enough to prevent a cycle like:

  1. Corporate landscape.
  2. You got a few federated alternatives growing.
  3. Federations grow enough to become the main landscape.
  4. Corporations do something [I do not know what] better than federations.
  5. Corporates grow to the point of dwarfing the federations, into a corporate landscape.

For example, it's possible for me that corporations are specially able to exploit a federated landscape through EEE. I'm just conjecturing though.