this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
144 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30573 readers
226 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

My personal ideal? A democratically run workplace with no permanent executive leadership. Rotating leadership duties, with maybe a Roman Republic style emergency power dictatorship, with a simple majority needed to end said emergency powers.

Ideal response to this situation? Fire the leadership who fucked up, or cut their pay at least, before firing anyone else. They make much more than ordinary workers.

[–] elscallr@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You ever seen a camel? It's a horse that's been designed by a committee. Democratically run things don't accomplish shit because you can never get groups of people to agree on anything.

[–] Friendship@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Camels are pretty dang well designed creatures so I'd say the committee did pretty great there. And the alternative is being at the whims of a single person or a small group none of whom have any incentive to care about anything other than the enrichment of their own personal finances. It's a literal autocracy.

Governance structures where the workers own and have a say in the means of production are bound to have their own issues to be sure, but it beats out the current model.

[–] elscallr@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

They might be good at being camels, but they're terrible horses. And if you've ever tried to lead a group of more than a handful of people, you'd know they can never agree on shit. Someone has to make the call.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's one way of looking at it. Guess I'd just rather have a voice in a mediocre place than be someone's peon even if I respected their strategy.

Go figure! People with different personal priorities existing! What a world!

[–] elscallr@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No reason to be that way, we were having a nice conversation.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Be which way? I honestly don't know what you mean. I just said why I still have the ideals/preferences that I do despite the problems you pointed out with an ancient cliché.

Y'know, just having different preferences, like I said.

[–] elscallr@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, I took this the wrong way:

Go figure! People with different personal priorities existing! What a world!

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, sorry, just trying to be funny

[–] elscallr@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You ever seen a camel? It's a horse that's been designed by a committee. Democratically run things don't accomplish shit because you can never get groups of people to agree on anything.