101
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Dems support it because on a fundamental basis there is little difference between the two parties. Both lust after power, control and money and will break every rule to gain those - at both the party and individual member levels.

Ofc there are outliers like Bernie Sanders and (on a smaller scale) AOC, but the mere fact that the DNC pulled the 2015/16 scam on Bernie to push him out of the nomination offers clear proof that left-leaning, truly democratic outliers will never be allowed to win.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The world over, neoliberalism has created managed democracy. You can have the red neoliberals that are cruel and racist or the blue neoliberals that give you crumbs and pretend to be sad but one way or another, you're getting a neoliberal.

Because as you saw first hand, whenever they're threatened with an actual progressive, they have a class solidarity the rest of us can only dream of.

"Left-leaning" and "right-leaning" news outlets -- all of them coincidentally owned and operated by the ultra-wealthy -- united to call him a kook.

His own party repeatedly sold him out because they'd rather give Trump the best spot at the trough than get their own snouts out of it.

Sleazy corporations pooled their pennies to astroturf the ever loving fuck out of the internet and a hostile foreign government used Julian Assange to ensure the money kept flowing no matter the war crimes.

All backed by a bullshit economic philosphy that never comes true, but makes them filthy rich with every failure.

But in AOCs defense, the worst thing we could do is let infighting stop us from ever gaining the foothold we need to start prying these people from power.

And anything is better than fascists.

[-] khepri@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Can't argue with that, but it's a bit like saying that the surface of the Sun and a day at the beach are both hot. Like, I can't argue with you because of how you stated it, but there are matters of degrees in both cases.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That's fair. I simply believe the degree of separation is in the low single digits.

[-] khepri@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And I'm sure that's true to your personal experience. But I hope you'll accept that for millions of Americans, we feel like one side wants to criminalize our very existence and way of life, and one side does not. Corruption aside, which I can agree is rampant across the spectrum, one side is openly questioning whether entire groups of people should be allowed to live out their lives enjoying the same freedoms as the rest of us, and that, for me, is important.

[-] TheKingBee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

one side wants to criminalize our very existence and way of life, and the other side will do nothing to stop them. I mean they'll make some mouth noises but when push comes to shove you'll find at their hands are always tied...

[-] absentthereaper@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And for another subset of millions of Americans, both sides have criminalized us and profited off it since the failure of Reconstruction; so that's a bird that's not going to fly around me. I'm not going to take away the fact that there absolutely is a faction gunning for you; but if you're going to play that card, you're gonna have to zoom out and look at it from a more macro point of view and realize there's historically-backed reasons that other people absofuckinglutely do not trust the people you call 'savior'.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
101 points (95.5% liked)

politics

19102 readers
3526 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS