News

36966 readers

1752 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

197

What Alabama’s IVF ruling reveals about the ascendant Christian nationalist movement (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Supporters of the idea that the US should be a Christian country have a foothold in politics – and are growing bolder

In the Alabama state supreme court case that dubbed embryos “extrauterine children” and imperiled the future of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in the state, the first reference to the Bible arrives on page 33.

“The principle itself – that human life is fundamentally distinct from other forms of life and cannot be taken intentionally without justification – has deep roots that reach back to the creation of man ‘in the image of God’,” the Alabama supreme court justice Tom Parker wrote in an opinion that concurred with the majority. Attributing the idea to the Book of Genesis, Parker’s opinion continued to cite the Bible as well as such venerable Christian theologians as John Calvin and Thomas Aquinas.

For experts, Parker’s words were a stunningly open embrace of Christian nationalism, or the idea that the United States should be an explicitly Christian country and its laws should reflect that.

“He framed it entirely assuming that the state of Alabama is a theocracy, and that that is a legitimate way of evaluating laws and policies,” said Julie Ingersoll, a University of North Florida professor who studies religion and culture. “It looks like he decided to just dismiss the history of first amendment religious freedom jurisprudence at the federal level, and assume that it just doesn’t apply to Alabama.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You should get on that yesterday as petitioning citizenship through ancestry can take up to several years in most European countries.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We have been working on it for about six months. Unfortunately, we didn't know about it before then. We do also have dual US-UK citizenship available to us, which I stupidly have not taken advantage of making official until about then too.

Here's the very weird situation in my family if you're curious. My great-grandfather was English but married a German woman and they lived in Berlin, where my grandfather was born. He married my Grandmother, who was English, and they lived in London, where my father was born. My grandfather became a British subject and you have to renounce your German citizenship if you gain citizenship elsewhere. However, he did so several years after my father, who then emigrated here to the U.S., was born, making my father a de facto German citizen, which would, if we get all the papers together and get through the German bureaucracy, make he and I and my daughter German citizens based on the shit ton of research my brother has done.

We're both unhappy and happy that my father never knew, because he was both Jewish and grew up in London during the Blitz, so he wasn't especially fond of Germans, an unfortunate bigotry he carried to his death (he excepted German Jews because "the Nazis didn't consider them German.") and if he found out he was German, it would have killed him. Or at least he would have ranted about it non-stop for about three years and none of us wanted to deal with that shit. On the other hand, it would have made this whole thing so much easier.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I feel like:

My grandfather forfeited his German citizenship so his family could escape the holocaust

Is a pretty strong case for you to be granted citizenship.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Maybe. It was 1936 that he renounced his citizenship, so that may or may not be considered. However, my great-grandmother did own an apartment building with business spaces below it in East Berlin which was confiscated by the Nazis and my grandfather and father spent about a decade trying to get it back after the Berlin Wall fell (they finally did but had to sell it for a very low price because there were price caps due to the poverty in East Berlin) so that might be considered?