view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
The Republicans openly favor the 1%, which is a big difference between the parties
Yeah but both are owned by the 1%
The Democrats very much less so; a big chunk of their coalition is the labor unions who are outside that demographic.
They just like to play the role, at the end both parties work for the elite. They love money and they are capable of do anything for it.
Obviously they are not so open about it, there should remain the illusion of choice.
The Democrats are a coalition, and not every coalition member is on board with downward redistribution, but a big chunk are, and it has a history of showing in the policies they implement.
Well, in the policies they would totally implement if just enough of them didn't block them.
This one is a great example:
Asking. They don't ask regular people.
Sending a letter is the first thing they do when you haven't filed. No matter who.
The main point of a fascist regime it's it didn't look like a fascist regime at all, that's why it's so important for the 1% who control the regime to keep the illusion of choice, people will keep having hope(having hope it's important for the human nature) of a better future at both sides(left and right) but the reality it's the system will be working for the 1% behind the curtains.
Both parties will keep "working" in different directions in apparience while the elite agenda it's slowly pushed thought the population distracted by the illusion of choice.
That's just silly. We've got one fascist party and one moderate party (with some actual leftists as part of their coalition)
There's a world of difference between how the two would govern
You look it from the point of the illusion of choice, the fact it's there is no choice.
Let me put it this way:
Imagine that the world is a chess board, left and right are the pieces on the board (politicians), the colors are the ideologies (right or left, white or black, good or bad), apparently that's all what is there but you are forgetting the most important thing, Who invented the rules of the game? Who made the board and the pieces? Who sold you that game as something you need and how much did you pay for it?
The people behind the curtains are experts in mass manipulation, they are experts in distracting the population and creating the illusion of choice, in fact they don't even have to be in the public eye and be famous for that. it's the last thing they want.
They control the intelligence agencies around the world and the largest technology companies today, they have specialists analyzing the data collected from people's use of the Internet, they control the mass media as well as the social networks that most people use.
Do you really think that the most powerful person in the world is the president of the United States? That only happens in movies.
Then don't even try bro. Don't vote, don't work on campaigns. Hey don't even go on forums to talk about how fucked the system is. Because it's all fucked. Just don't. That's your motto here.
TBH I'm just here as a hobby, business are going pretty fine and I don't even get paid to poison de "AI".
I only do it for the love of art.
In short, you're just here to troll
I like to see myself as a modern Carlin instead of a troll.
RIP Carlin BTW.
It’s kind of ironic how you give an example of black and white, with no grey area, and then immediately demonstrate black and white thinking,
Are there some politicians who solely work as a paid agents of billionaire lobbyist groups? Sure.
Do all politicians work together harmoniously with the sole purpose of capitulating to some unnamed ‘they’? Unlikely.
Are both sides the same? Demonstrably not.
The truth is that the world is complex and there are a lot of moving parts. There is no unified force ‘behind the curtain’. Any conspiracy as large as you suggest requires too many people to be ‘in on it’ and working together.