California’s low energy primary: Turnout on track for a record low. Only about 8% of voters had returned ballots as of Tuesday. (www.politico.com)

submitted 8 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Lower turnout generally means fewer Democrats are voting. “This is the kind of thing that would benefit Steve Garvey,” Mitchell said.

Primary turnout is typically all over the map. But there’s at least the potential for this year to be among the lowest in history due to an all-but-decided presidential primary and voter apathy.

A recent poll from the Public Policy Institute of California found low numbers of likely voters are excited about the election. Less than 40 percent said they were “extremely” or “very” enthusiastic about voting for president this year. That number dropped even further (28 percent) when it came to voting for Congress.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] matjoeman@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

Please vote. There's an open seat for Senate (no incumbent) which is one of the best times for your vote to have a real impact. This doesn't happen very often. In California there were no open Senate elections for over 20 years (1993-2017).

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm definitely voting. I do every election. Local and state races have the biggest impact on our lives.

Also, me voting:

[-] sfbing@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Agreed. For the Senate race, Katie Porter is the progressive choice, endorsed by Elizabeth Warren.

https://bpr.berkeley.edu/2024/02/07/katie-porter-is-the-progressive-choice/

Her competitor, Adam Schiff, is the old-school Nancy Pelosi choice. He has been running ads that boost the Republican Steve Garvey in an attempt to eliminate Porter from the race.

[-] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

I vote in every primary and general, but are there any cheat sheets for voting on these offices? For stuff like House and Senate races, it's usually easy enough to find the candidate online and check their voting history and policy statements to see how much of a cretin they really are.

But for a lot of positions, like judges, school board, etc., you usually get a nameless face with no party affiliation and rarely anything turns up when you google them.

[-] matjoeman@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I get mailers from local political groups with their voter guides. They recommend different people based on if the group is moderate or progressive, lol.

If you didn't get any of those or your town doesn't have those groups you can try just googling "CITY NAME voter guide".

[-] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah. I've tried that, and I've found a couple of resources, but they never cover the "non-partisan" positions (a joke of a term). At least not in my area.

But something like you said that's as simple as "if you're progressive, here's a list of names. If you're a moderate, don't vote :)" would be great.

this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024

43 points (90.6% liked)

politics

19104 readers

1544 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News