1012
submitted 10 months ago by tree@lemmy.zip to c/theonion@midwest.social
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 101 points 10 months ago

I'm still slightly peeved about an old CEO that was all about "making data driven decisions" but when people presented data he didn't like he'd ignore it.

"Hey a couple studies are showing that 4 day work weeks are a net positive, do you-"

"We're not doing that "

"But look at this data."

" Next question."

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

It's always like that. "Facts before ego", except when it's your facts and my ego.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 25 points 10 months ago

This is why we need to replace humans workers with AI starting at the top instead of the bottom.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Bad idea. In order to get a computer to do anything useful, you must first be honest about what outcome you want. This means saying the quiet part out loud, resulting an an AI prompt something like:

Develop a business plan optimizing for shareholder value, maximizing bonus payout for top leadership, leveraging all company assets, while avoiding lawsuits that will end the company. Legal problems are okay provided they do not interfere with increasing company value. Assume full workforce productivity and minimal depreciation on assets.

What follows is a cutthroat business plan that will make a killing on Wall St. in the short run, and make everyone in said business absolutely miserable. All remaining ethics that are left at the C-level get thrown right in the trash. Also: this kills the environment.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

True, but I'm hoping they just feed in their company mission and the AI goes insane trying to make sense of it

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

I think I saw that on Star Trek once. They made a planet go mad.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Or, we could just implement the algorithms that are already available, and not tell it to maximize shareholder value, but instead company productivity, and you'll get the most efficient companies possible.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

There was an article back in 2011 that predicted that middle and upper management were already completely replaceable using management algorithms. They want the tech to replace the rest of us before they implement that level of automation.

[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I have no mouth and I must scream. We're already there with the stock market, we just have useless ceo's.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

At a "town hall", many months ago ...

VP: We would like to hear feedback from all of you.

Me: And what would be the best way we can provide you with that feedback?

VP: ...

VP: (thinking - obviously didn't have an answer for this)

VP: ...

VP: just email me.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

what he really meant was he felt really good when data backed his priors

this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
1012 points (99.3% liked)

The Onion

4688 readers
1289 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS