381
submitted 9 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] capital@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Boy, that was a ton of words you just put in my mouth.

You knocked the absolute shit outta that straw man.

edit:

Now that I have time, let's respond to this properly.

Yup, and they successfully argued for years that their non-physical presence in a state meant they should not pay sales taxes in that state, effectively forcing states to subsidize Amazon at the expense of local businesses.

I wasn't talking about this. You brought it up because it's an easy point to make, one which I agree with but unfortunately this is where you began construction of the straw man.

I think you'll find employees of the company all paid taxes in the state they worked/got paid in.

So what you seem to be arguing is that logic dictates that anyone with the economic power to ensure or prevent the passage of laws is necessarily correct

This builds on the foundation of the straw man above.

No. With me, you'll do well not to try to read between the lines. I asked questions in almost all of my responses. What do people want? To force people not to move? To pay taxes in states they don't live in anymore? No one has engaged those questions because they know that's what would be required in this situation to get him to pay more state tax.

and that the only definition for a term like “theft” is the legal interpretation that you, as a non-lawyer, decide to apply

Oh, and then I asked if a buddy of mine who moved states is also a thief because he did the exact same thing with two other states. Y'know, to gauge what my interlocutor believed constituted "theft". Should they not be able to move? Should they be made to pay state taxes to a state which they don't live in anymore?

You’re saying that, despite centuries and millennia of colloquial usages of the term, both predating and concurrently used with the very restricted legal definition, any dictionary or other usage-derived definition is invalid.

Yeah I cheapens the word. If they were using it colloquially, one wonders why they didn't reply immediately clarifying what they meant. It's almost as if they didn't mean it that way...

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 4 points 9 months ago

Your entire chain of comments here is a strawman, buddy.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Asking clarifying questions of the other party to better understand what their saying isn’t a straw man, Jack.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago

You gave a false dichotomy and then went on a rant about why they're wrong for arguing one of those two things after being told they weren't arguing either of those things.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

How else do you force someone to pay taxes in a state they don’t live in?

You said it was a false dichotomy, right? What’s the other option(s)?

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

How about if we eliminated rent seeking and both states required these wealthy individuals to contribute to the society that allowed them to build said wealth in the first place? That's just one of countless possibilities.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

“Let’s get Florida to institute a state income tax and more on top for capital gains to match.”?

I mean, yeah? I’d like that. Is it ever going to happen save some overarching federal law standardizing everything? No.

Is moving and no longer paying state taxes for a state you don’t live in anymore “theft”? Also no.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

One state has high taxes that everyone paid to provide safety and support for businesses to operate profitably. If you move states you are taking the profit that everyone in your community contributed to.

It's a micro version of the reason the US now taxes millionaires who try to hide their US profits in tax havens. They wanted the security of the US to build their business but don't want to contribute to maintain that safety for others once they have their money.

So yes you can move to another country or another state. But you shouldn't be able to take all the profits when you leave without giving back something to the community that gave you that wealth.

this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
381 points (95.7% liked)

News

23301 readers
1774 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS