this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
638 points (96.2% liked)

News

35692 readers
2813 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Is the headline not part of an article?

[–] protist@mander.xyz 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

When one says a publication is grossly misleading, it certainly implies the entire publication

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Often the author doesn't write he headline. Not sure it matters but most a bit of info.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're not wrong, but we also should stop excusing, normalizing, and accepting wildly exaggerated for sales purposes titles of articles.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

We should stop accepting lies.

Unless there is some way this reaction actually did produce twice the energy input, it’s not misleading it’s a lie.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why have we accepted the standard of misleading headlines? "Oh well you didn't read the article, I guess you and 90% of eyeballs get to be fundamentally misinformed" is an unhinged take.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I never said a misleading headline was acceptable. I said the publication is not misleading and that it covers the criticisms dude up above was leveling.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It is misleading, for someone to be misleading they must mislead, and the headline misleads.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The headline is part of the publication though.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

No, this is a popular science article, not an actual publication.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

"article" vs "publication"

Two different things.

The link takes you to an article. Publications are in actual scientific journals, not intended for popular consumption.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

What was your question? I only read "is the" and thought I could base my response off of only that.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When I see "publication" I assume it's the actual scientific paper and not the article reporting on said paper.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

That's a great point. I absolutely agree with you on that.

[–] Danksy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's easier to nitpick than it is to interact with the actual argument.

I agree with you. The headline is misleading, and I think it devalues the article.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago