this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
257 points (95.7% liked)

World News

42669 readers
3082 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So, do we get to start calling what's happening everywhere world war 3 or is there like some committee that meets on this?

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Once some major players start conscripting people I think it'd be reasonable to call it WW3. This is the preamble

[–] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hasn't russia been conscripting for a couple of years now?

[–] dlpkl@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

whether you or me like them or not, they are a major player.

now we just need china and a couple more euro countries to join in on the fun.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well it did say major players, plural. If you have major players directly in opposition and both feeling the need for conscription...

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

thats russia and the US right now.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see any draft in the US happening right now...

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they are desperate for conscripts

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would you say that? They aren't conscripting at all. There's not even a whiff of anyone suggesting we need to activate the draft.

Conscription refers to involuntary military service, and there hasn't been a hint of that since Vietnam (it worked out sooo well in Vietnam, with a crazy high incidence of soldiers killing their own superiors).

Even in voluntary service, recruiting is way less aggressive than it used to be. Growing up in the 80s/early 90s you were inundated with recruiting efforts, on radio, television, and even as a pretty aggressive part of school. My kid has not been nearly so exposed to recruiting efforts. Now we have a third of people going in compared to 1990 (and they are still turning down about 25% of applicants).

So I don't know where you are coming from, but involuntary service in US isn't vaguely in sight and even if you mistook voluntary service for 'conscripts', even that is at a 40 year low and still turning away people... Hardly seems 'deseperate'

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

they are participating on conflicts all over the world and are missing their targets for personnel, despite aggressive campaingns on social media kids.

this tells me enough about their involvement and possible future role in the next world war.

it doesnt need to be simpler than this.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago

You don't think Russia is a major player in this current shitshow? Or was it an attempt to belittle Russia?

I'm assuming its the latter because otherwise you're a dense motherfucker

[–] Bourff@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a world war only when western european countries are involved. Otherwise it's just sparkling conflict.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird 1 points 1 year ago

TBF, we aren't even remotely close to the scale of international conflict seen in the 2 world wars. You have to be deeply ignorant to think otherwise. Again, we're not even close, not even like a tiny fraction in terms of scale.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

It's not a war until the other side is able to fight back.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It's never a world war until it's over and the dust settles on the graves of millions around the globe.