Like that the whole world was flooded and repopulated by one single family, which is disproven by DNA samples.
Or that it is gods will that priest stay unmarried, which is historically agreed that it was a measure to keep wealth inside the church organization.
Or so so many more.

I never said there was prove god doesn't exist.
And like I said, there doesn't need to be as long as there is no documented sign whatsoever that points towards god actually existing.

[–] The_Lopen@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I see where I misunderstood. To reframe, you're saying that claims made by various religions/churches, which are presented as evidence of God, have been disproven, not that God has been disproven.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Obviously, the fact of whether or not there is a creator cant really be disproven, but I would say that any of the gods conjured up by humans have a pretty substantial amount of evidence going against their existence.

If there is a creator of some kind, it is so far beyond our comprehension that it is pretty much useless to ponder on.

Also, I'm not the person you were going back and forth with. I apologize for jumping in the conversation at a strange point.

[–] myslsl@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I never said there was prove god doesn't exist. And like I said, there doesn't need to be as long as there is no documented sign whatsoever that points towards god actually existing.

You also said: "A nonexistent almighty being". Did you mean no gods exist, or did you mean all the gods people claim to exist so far have been debunked?

More importantly, for the claim "no god exists" specifically, I disagree that no proof is required in general. There needs to be an actual proof as much as there needs to be a proof of the negation, that "a god exists", for either to be worth accepting. If neither can be proved, why commit to believing the truth of either?

Additionally, disproving particular examples doesn't prove the general rule. Having no documented sign pointing to the existence of a god does not confirm the absence of a god anymore than having no documented signs of a gas leak in your home confirms the absence of a gas leak in your home. Perhaps the detector you are using is broken, perhaps the type of gas leaking in your home is not detectable by your detector.

It would also be incredibly hard to design any kind of empirical test to confirm or disconfirm the existence of gods in general (not just the christian flavored ones).