this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
647 points (96.4% liked)

News

36118 readers
3046 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 years ago (3 children)

New Hampshire having a state law that they always get to go first, for a national election, that's been around for 100 years, is dumb as fuck.

It's good this change is happening. The primary orders should shuffle around more often. No state declaring "we're always first" within their state laws should be recognized at the federal level.

[–] nulluser@programming.dev 56 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Here's a crazy idea. Every state has their primary on the same day so that no state gets to dictate who others get to vote for.

Here's an even crazier idea. Ditch primaries altogether and use Ranked Choice Voting.

I'm sick and tired of other people deciding which lesser evils I'm allowed to choose between long before my turn to vote even comes around.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They should let the most populated states go first. I'm tired of having our votes count for nothing because half the candidates have already dropped out by the time they get to us, even though we outnumber the people in all the states that go before us. Those early wins and losses would really mean something if they represented a large and diverse population. Might make up a little for how underrepresented we are in the Electoral College.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

You as an individual are under-represented, but you as a populous state are too powerful. If California primaries first , no one else matters.

When New Hampshire primaries first, you get a lot of meeting the candidates, an interesting survey result, but the result is still wide open.

Either way, it’s all of us in the middle who get shafted. We don’t get an early say but our vote doesn’t count for much with the big guys coming soon.

I’m torn about whether it is good to be a “safe”state. While it’s nice that we don’t get the nonsense or the robocalls or the mail or the ads, would it hurt to get some attention? Can we be treated like we matter?

[–] nulluser@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How is that more fair than every state going at the same time?

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

The problem with that version is that, just as in the national election, the candidates will only really campaign in the purple states with a lot of independent or undecided voters. I'd like to see them have to reach out to a diversity of voters within their own parties first. I'm not saying it's more fair necessarily, just that I think it would be good for the process and maybe help each party wind up with a better (or at least more representative of the party as a whole) candidate in the general.

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

I'm a fan of random order, all within 5 weeks. With polls being open over the entire week.

Helps get more voices in the say. With every state having turns seeing higher candidate engagement that only Iowa gets now. And candidates not feeling pressured to drop out right away because Iowa didn't like them.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

At first I disagreed a bit, but primaries are changing from what they used to be, so maybe you have a point. Used to be that there wasn't that much political noise the year before a presidential primary, but now we've got debates and all sorts. There's time now for candidates to get their ideas out there and for people to know who they are. I don't think that was the case in say 2016, where we really got to know Bernie as time went on and that raised his popularity.

[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

Every state should go the same day.

[–] BloodSlut@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

omw to the state capital to draft a law saying my state gets to go firster