1019
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Bill Gates wants ultra-wealthy individuals to pay more tax — and now a growing chorus of billionaires agree.

In his annual "Ask Me Anything" forum on Reddit last year, the Microsoft cofounder said he was "surprised" that taxes for the rich haven't been increased more.

Gates doubled down on his calls to tax the rich in a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos this week. He said the wealthiest nations should donate more money to developing countries to help redress inequality.

"Those who have the most — whether it's countries, companies, or individuals — should be pushed to be more generous," he said.

It seems others agree, as more than 250 ultra-wealthy people signed an open letter calling for global leaders to impose a wealth tax.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gencha@lemm.ee 53 points 9 months ago

Says the guy who funnels his entire wealth through a foundation to avoid paying any taxes. Just like he told Epstein to do. Love you Bill

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

But you see, he deserves it for stealing all that work and ideas from other people

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 7 points 9 months ago

I mean, isn't that the definition of owning a company? You profit off of the work your employees do

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Even when we pretend that's ok, and pretend that his policy of "embrace, extend, exterminate" is also fine, he personally stole other people's work. He straight up admited stealing from Xerox (along with Steve Jobs), and stole MS-DOS from Gary Kildall.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 9 months ago

and stole MS-DOS from Gary Kildall

Didn't he buy it?

Bought it under false pretences and massively profited off of it, but bought it nonetheless. That makes it seem more similar to typical capitalist exploitation than direct theft.

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It's extinguish, not exterminate.

Much subtler, see =)

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Wikipedia says both are right 🤓

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz -2 points 9 months ago

¯_(ツ)_/¯ At least bill is probably the most generous billionaire that has existed so far

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If there was ever a generous billionaire, they'd no longer be a billionaire.

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

It's really fucking hard to spend that much money in a smart way.

Yea, you could just throw it out of a plane, but when you've got multiple billions it's actually hard. There was even a documentary about it: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088850/

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

This is what slaves actually believe

[-] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 5 points 9 months ago

It's all relative. The "most generous so far" can still be a really low bar.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think Elon is most generous billionaire, for spending 44b to free us from Twitter

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Most of his charity is a smoke screen that allows him to hide billions in tax shelters.

this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
1019 points (97.5% liked)

News

23305 readers
3619 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS