364
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

President Biden and other senior U.S. officials are becoming increasingly frustrated with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his rejection of most of the administration's recent requests related to the war in Gaza, four U.S. officials with direct knowledge of the issue told Axios.

Why it matters: Since the Oct. 7 Hamas attack 100 days ago, Biden has given Israel his full backing, with unprecedented military and diplomatic support, even while taking a political hit from part of his base in an election year. That support has largely continued publicly, but behind the scenes, there are growing signs that Biden is losing his patience, the U.S. officials said.

  • "The situation sucks and we are stuck. The president's patience is running out," one U.S. official told Axios.
  • "At every juncture, Netanyahu has given Biden the finger," Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who has been in close contact with U.S. officials about the war, told Axios. "They are pleading with the Netanyahu coalition, but getting slapped in the face over and over again."

Behind the scenes: Biden hasn't spoken to Netanyahu in the 20 days since a tense Dec. 23 call, which a frustrated Biden ended with the words: "This conversation is over." They had spoken almost every other day in the first two months of the war.

  • Before Biden hung up, Netanyahu had rejected his request that Israel release the Palestinian tax revenues it's withholding.
  • National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby tried to downplay the decrease in communication, telling reporters on Wednesday that "it doesn't say anything" about the state of the relationship.
  • But more and more signs of irritation are emerging. "There is immense frustration," a U.S. official said.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Unemployment when Trump left office - 6.3%

Unemployment today- 3.7%

Seems to me like more people with jobs means less people losing those things under Biden.

[-] groupofcrows@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 months ago

Their feelings are more valid than your facts... I couldn't believe I was hearing such non sense from senior Republicans but they were right about their base.

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago

Unemployment level is meaningless if there's no livable wage. Taking 1 full time job and creating 2 part-time is not job growth, and that's exactly what's been happening. How many of those shitty no benefit jobs are being held by one person?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

You tell me. You're clearly the expert here.

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

You didn't tell me.

[-] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

The banks and the rich are squeezing every dime they can out of American working class, but the probable GOP nominee is the absolute wrong way to curb it.

Remember for example when he stole medical supplies and gave them to his criminal friends, who could then resell them for a higher price? During a pandemic..

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

Medical supplies are your red line, not genocide?

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social -5 points 9 months ago

the unemployment statistic only counts people who file for unemployment, and in 2020, a lot of us were able to pull $1200 a week with no look-for-work requirement.

i don't think this is a fair comparison.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Do you have numbers showing that the levels of unemployed people not filing was dramatically different? If not, then this is meaninhless fud.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social -4 points 9 months ago

> If not, then this is meaninhless fud.

wrong. it's only meaningless "fud" if we do have the numbers and they don't support what i'm saying.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, that's not how it works. If you're making some unsubstantiated claim, can't back it up, spreading negativity, then it's meaningless, anecdotal fud.

If you do have something to back it up, then it's not.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social -3 points 9 months ago

anecdotes aren't meaningless or fud

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

They aren't useful at all for making claims about large trends.

You were making claims about the full market. Stats or it didn't happen

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social -4 points 9 months ago

you can see the u3 trends

this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
364 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19098 readers
4753 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS