712
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Jay Ashcroft flopped when faced with the most dreaded predicament amongst grandstanding blowhards: a follow-up question

Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft’s attempt to justify his ludicrous threat to have President Joe Biden removed from the state’s electoral ballot spiraled into chaos over the most basic of questions: “How so?”

During a Monday interview with CNN’s Boris Sanchez, the Republican was asked how he justified his threats to have Biden removed from the state’s ballot in retaliation for recent attempts to remove Trump from state ballots on grounds that his actions in the aftermath of the 2020 election constitute insurrection. The constitutionality of such a removal will soon be reviewed by the Supreme Court.

“What would then be your justification for removing Joe Biden from the ballot in Missouri. Has he engaged in your mind in some kind of insurrection?” Sanchez asked.

“There have been allegations that he’s engaged in insurrection,” Ashcroft replied. He was then met with the most dreaded predicament amongst grandstanding blowhards: a follow-up question.

“How so?” Sanchez asked, prompting Ashcroft to demand that Sanchez stop interrupting him. “You can’t say something like that and not back it up,” Sanchez countered.

“You interrupted me before I could back it up,” a flustered Ashcroft complained. “Are you scared of the truth?”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 58 points 5 months ago

You can’t tell me this clown is not inbred. Or at least the progeny of some sort of greasy-haired weasel creature.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 80 points 5 months ago

His dad was afraid of the nipples on statues.

I miss the days when he was the most embarrassing Attorney General J. Ashcroft in the country.

[-] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

I thought this was the same guy and was thinking he aged well

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

His dad was afraid of the nipples on statues.

In his dad's defense, you gotta be careful with those or you'll put your eye out.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

The venn diagram of boobs and Red Ryder BB guns has more overlap than I would have guessed.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago
[-] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

I knew asscraft was involved with this somehow.

[-] MelodiousFunk@kbin.social 11 points 5 months ago

There it is. Was wondering if there was any relation, to the point where I had half a mind to look it up myself. Thanks for saving me the trouble.

It's nepotism and cronyism all the way down.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

OOOOhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Right!

Well fucking hell, Missouri.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

deleted by creator

[-] Hegar@kbin.social 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

some sort of greasy-haired weasel creature.

Brutal imperialist torture lawyer, as it happens.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago

Helped get us fucked in Iraq & Afghanistan shit weasel.

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

Nature does in fact make mistakes.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 5 months ago

The tragic end result of a meerkat left alone with a vial of human growth hormone and a copy of atlas shrugged

this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
712 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18017 readers
3613 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS