142
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by neidu2@feddit.nl to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

And I know we're mostly atheists here, but please keep the theological discussion to a minimum and appreciate the lighthearted hypothetical scenario for what it is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

Thall shalt not allow predators to sell underage girls to celebrities.

This one gives too much room for loopholes.

Thall shalt not sell, trade, or in any way own people.

This one seems better, it would also be better since it would apply not just now but also thousands (or hundreds, I don't know when it happened) of years ago.

[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

People are ingenious getting around rules. The trader will make a gift of the slave to the property of the second person who will then make a gift of cash to the trader. The property owner will, of course, manage the slaves owned by the property.

[-] MinekPo1@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 10 months ago

no no , God would clearly be ok with selling boys/men , enbies and women over the age of consent to celebrities and even girls , as long as you are not a predator /j

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
142 points (91.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43812 readers
905 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS