35
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Trollception@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Yes, all companies should be required to climate risk.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

And here I thought they were climate risking this whole time.

[-] scientist@eu.mastodon.green 2 points 10 months ago

@Trollception @silence7

Exon Mobil's risk assessment. Go out of business ASAP!

this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
35 points (94.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5244 readers
133 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS