254
submitted 10 months ago by GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Federal drug officials are warning Georgia to shelve its plans to be the first state to allow pharmacies to dispense medical marijuana products.

News outlets report that the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration on Nov. 27 warned pharmacies that dispensing medical marijuana violates federal law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 25 points 10 months ago

Because it's a prescription medication, just like any other. It's far more convenient to pick up prescription just like you do any other.

There will be far fewer dispensaries than pharmacies, so less choice, more driving, and worse hours.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Dispensaries vastly outnumber pharmacies in the towns I’ve lived in (Oregon, Colorado, New Mexico) and also have more convenient hours (Denver they’re 8 am - 10 pm). I also have doubts about the varieties they’d stock and the quality. Being prescribed cannabis in most states means you shop at regular stores and get a discount, or in non-rec states that you can go there at all - and they tend to have a tremendous variety. It’s not like being prescribed a pharmaceutical that comes in one brand and a generic pill like most prescriptions.

I’d also much rather talk to someone who understands cannabis and cannabinoids topics - RSO, CBD, edibles, dabbing and so forth - than a pharmacist. I would anticipate a pharmacy giving much worse overall service than a dispensary.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Your experience is nothing like what Georgia has going on.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 1 points 10 months ago

It doesn't sound like Georgia has anything going on, based on the article.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's virtually nothing, yes.

Norml.org is a great resource to understand what the current laws and options are on a state by state basis.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago
[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You should just look it up on norml.org for yourself really.

Basically though, GA has a very restrictive MMJ program with only low THC oil allowed at all and something like 6 dispensaries total in the whole state... Nothing like Colorado, Oregon, or New Mexico at all.

The option for pharmacies to dispense the super low THC oil was an idea to expand access in the state.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago

I’m aware and it’s not surprising that they have an anemic MMJ program. If they wanted to expand access, there are plenty of other states to emulate vs. handing business to Walgreens and CVS. Perhaps just expand the number of dispensaries.

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Canada legalized years ago and there are dispensaries all over the place in cities! If you're in living in rural areas obviously there's not as many, but still one or two within reasonable distance.

Remote areas have their stuff mailed in.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Right. Where I lived in Denver, there were 4 dispensaries in wakking distance and 1 pharmacy, Walgreens.

The only exceptions are the small conservative towns that banned dispensaries in their city limits or counties saying “we don’t want DRUGS in our city!!” So the stores set up just outside of city limits and the cities have just as much weed and no tax revenue.

[-] mark3748@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

If you’re talking about the Springs, the whole county has banned recreational. Manitou is able to have them because it’s a home-rule city.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It's not the county. Palmer Lake has dispensaries now, too.

[-] mark3748@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah, except no. Again, most Colorado municipalities are home-rule.

Edit: I like how I linked directly to the county showing that El Paso county does not allow recreational cannabis retailers, including the ordinance banning retail (13-01) and still got downvoted.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

I was think of some towns on the Front Range... Greeley, Fort Collins, Windsor. I recall that about Springs but they still have medical, right?

[-] mark3748@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, there are medical dispensaries on every corner it seems. It’s not nearly as conservative as generally portrayed, it’s just that the only people that vote in local elections are the focus on the family crowd so we end up with shit.

[-] Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

I agree with the other commenter here. I could see this going the other way for smaller towns or more rural areas, but where I am at right now there are 4 dispensaries and 2 pharmacies in a 5 mile radius.

It's also Sunday; one of those pharmacies is closed and the other one will close at 12 in the afternoon. As for the dispensaries, one of them will close at 5 and the others will close at 10 ~no different than any other day of the week.

Getting rid of dispensaries in favor of pharmacies here would benefit nobody except for the drug companies.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The nearest pharmacy is two miles away. The neareat dispensary is a half mile away. The 2nd nearest is across the street from that one.

There are more dispensaries than there are pharmacies, bars, and churches in my state.

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
254 points (98.8% liked)

News

23305 readers
3656 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS