this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
47 points (86.2% liked)
Asklemmy
43899 readers
620 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
All your points are kind of fair to be worried about, but they have also all being debunked.
Overpopulation? Were having an underpopulation chrisis in the west.
Trump? You already have him! Making billions of people suffer didn't fix that already.
Etc.
What's Carousel BTW?
Developed countries often have flat or negative population growth. Even so[ the population of the US is still growing; we gained 1.2 million people between 2020-2021. However, it doesn't matter, because most of the peopl in the world don't live in "the West". There are 300M people in the US; India, alone, has a population of 1.4 billion. India's population grew by 11.2 million in 2020-2021.
The total world population grew by 68 million in 2020. Where in the world did you hear that we're having an underpopulation crisis in the West?
Yes, we have Trump. But someday, we won't. We won't have Putin, or Kim Jong Un. Old age, and death by it, doesn't guarantee that a country's leadership will get better, but for some populations it's their only chance.
Europe and Japan.
Are your +1.2M also not immigration?
And yes everyone isn't in the west but eventually they'll be developed nations too and then people have less children.
You'll have another Trump of Reagan or whatever anyways, it's a democratic problem, not something being old solves. Doesn't stop either if the two USA pretenders eh.
Curing aging doesn't make people immortal or something, it just cures that particular disease. Like we have cures for lots of other diseases.
Idk who down voted you btw.
Japan is not in "the West." It also has a relatively small population; it's only a third of the size of tye US, and less than a tenth of either China or India. Germany's population is flat, but it's even smaller than Japan. France's population is growing. Spain's is declining slightly, but its even smaller than Germany - half the population size! Overall, the total rate of population change in the combined EU is a fraction of the number of new people the US added, and a drop in the bucket compared to the total growth of the overall World population.
Were you suggesting that anti-aging technology should only be available to people in the wealthier countries? Because those are almost the only ones with flat or negative growth. If everyone has access equally, then there will be a population explosion and crisis, because the countries adding the most people to the world right now are also the largest - by orders of magnitude.