this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
245 points (98.0% liked)

News

37079 readers
497 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In Pennsylvania, residents are resisting a corporate takeover of their water system as state lawmakers attempt to change a law that incentivizes privatization.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ElectricCattleman@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

My sister is a civil engineer in PA and is familiar with this situation. She told me that basically these municipalities did not take care of their pipes, refused to raise any money for them, then, when they got old enough that the situation became critical, sold it off. Now this company comes along, has to make required fixes to the pipes, and has to raise the money to do so. The private company gets to be the bad guy, while the local governments, who neglected the pipes for a decade or more, don't get heat.

All this said, if they weren't allowed to sell it to a private company, there would be no "get out of jail free" card and maybe they would have pushed harder to take care of them damn pipes.

Point is, I don't think it's quite as simple as it looks on the surface.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

She told me that basically these municipalities did not take care of their pipes,

So it's bog-standard "let-it-break-and-then-sell-it-for-a-song" neolib shitfuckery.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 11 points 2 years ago

Yeah, man if Boomer's parents could see how they are running the government systems that were so carefully put in place there would be a lot of beatings again.

We really are in the "gut everything and fire everyone so that I can save a few more bucks for myself" endgame

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's the same tactic for the NHS in the UK, the one remaining publicly-owned service the Tories can't get away with selling off, so they're letting it slowly die.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

so they’re letting it slowly die.

It's the exact same thing here in South Africa with the electricity grid - popular resistance is too strong for the ANC-regime to just sell it off to billionaire parasites, so they are just "sabotaging it in place."

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The state could have done any number of things to make sure a situation like this would never happen in the first place.

Not going to dox myself, but I'll just say that I'm familiar with how (functioning) state government agencies finance these types of infrastructure projects. Often, it's not even state money, they get it from the Federal government, and are responsible for administering it according to certain requirements.

In fact, Biden's Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provided billions of dollars to states for this exact type of project. PA State government failed it's citizens. Again.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is a feature of corrupt state government in the US south. They abandon their infrastructure, pocket the cash, sell the infrastructure once it fails or do what Mississippi did and just make fema come in and replace it all.

Corrupt southern states hurt their own constituents for money.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So what is the answer to that?

Clearly representative government simply doesn't work since even after a revolution, some unscrupulous evildoer can just fake their way into office and repeat the cycle all over again, so what will it take to fix the problem?

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The answer was to go back in time and make sure we don't fuck up Reconstruction.

But what do we do now?

Clearly we need a better way that ensures our basic needs are met and other people can't simply fuck it up or take them away from other people.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even typical infrastructure funding ultimately gets money from the EPA. Before it was just NEPA projects, but now we have BIL, ARPA, and WIIN grant projects.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, I mentioned that. People don't really have a concept of how much money the federal government is giving to states for infrastructure projects...

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was on site for an ARPA project and the contractor was complaining that Biden never did anything for rural America...

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah, the cognitive dissonance is wild. Even in a blue state.