194
Donald Trump Still Wants to Kill Obamacare. Why?
(www.nytimes.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
194 points (93.7% liked)
politics
19082 readers
3453 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
They 1) think free market is better by definition and 2) don't believe in social programs. So they don't need to replace, just repeal.
They may pretend that they think that. Some small few may even think that they think that. But they don't actually think that.
The easiest way to see what people believe is to observe their actions.
Republicans are absolutely fine with handing out big juicy government contracts to a select few contractors, for example, instead of letting the market decide.
Republicans are absolutely fine with banning books from libraries instead of letting the market decide.
Republicans are absolutely fine with starting a trade war with China, instead of letting the market decide.
Republicans are absolutely fine with banning women's access to medical care, instead of letting the market decide.
Republicans are absolutely fine with interfering with the free market and giving tons of cash to large corporations.
No, Republicans do not think free market is better by definition. They simply lie and say that when the alternative is to admit that their policy is rooted in bigotry.
Except for the military, that's a social program.
Trump called them suckers and don't give them healthcare.
There's a lot to unpack in that statement.
Point is they don't give two shits about the people in the military. Use and discard. But they like the concept of a military because rah rah USA USA we can win wars. Not because it can be argued as a social program, that part they can do without.
Again, I'm inferring that the social program is for the military weapons manufacturers because they get a shit ton of money and it helps the economy..
Military spending doesn't help the economy, it hurts the economy. Look up peace dividend.
How’s that working out in Texas this winter coming?
I couldn't believe when that storm happened and some Republican (Texan I think) got on TV and says "what are you the people doing to solve this?" They bought hard into private market solves everything.
They also blamed wind and solar for the problem, as if the grid totally relied on them.