this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
62 points (79.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

62787 readers
484 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
62
Beeper Mini (play.google.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 

So there is this app claiming on-device iMessage functionality on Android. Seems cool but only has subscription based pricing. Does anyone know of a way to circumvent this?

Edit: I found this but it seems a bit dodgy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

They can't block it, as it's using the standard imessage way. They could change the way iMessage works, but that would break iMessage support on older iOS devices that no longer are supported.

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 2 points 2 years ago

One more reason for people to get a new iPhone 🥳

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

They'll probably find a way of authenticating that a phone number is using an iPhone, or start requiring an extra step when a number tries registering for use on its servers.

[–] Pyroglyph@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

that would break iMessage support on older iOS devices that no longer are supported

Yes, that's what "no longer supported" means.

[–] XyliaSky@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

In this context “no longer supported” just means “no longer receiving active development support”. Not “doesn’t work with the service”.

So actually no, that’s not what “no longer supported” means here, at all.