270
submitted 1 year ago by LessQuit@feddit.nu to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Seen in Meta's new Twitter competitor

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] manned_meatball@lemmy.ml 71 points 1 year ago

possibly never going to happen

[-] fedev@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

People never read, just click the accept button.

Everyone knows it, it was even on S06E01 of Black Mirror.

[-] WeThePilgrims@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago

The last two for fuck sake; after that list what the hell is, or how does Fuckerburg, define 'sensitive data'?

'People' won't react to this until they are hit with a real and tangible consequence:

'sorry, based on the heath data you gave to Meta we're doubling your insurance premiums'

[-] fedev@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

"Looking at your poor health choices and sports selection, sorry, we can't"

[-] socphoenix@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago

You're probably right, but why in the heck does instagram need health and fitness data? That really should set off alarm bells to any of the saps downloading that thing...

[-] manned_meatball@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

it's a social network. Some people do post things related to health and fitness, and it's another gold mine of private data for ad targeting, so from a business perspective it makes sense to have features that integrate Instagram with these health and fitness gadgets.

This list is a summary of the data they may collect. Using these apps don't mean you're handing all this info automatically. Most of these are actually voluntarily shared e.g. when the user connects a fitness app to it; or actively requested e.g. when they make use of location sharing in the in-app chat.

The more in-app functionality a user makes use of, the more data they'll hoard about that user.

[-] socphoenix@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for clarifying!

[-] YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Unless there's a massive data breach which affects them personally - though not sure how that would be.

The only way to go may be forcing the mega-terch companies to respect user rights, which you'd think would be a joke - and for google/facebook/microsoft that is a joke, though it is interesting that apple introduced that "opt in app do-not-track" thing last year, where facebook shat it's pants.

[-] manned_meatball@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

The only time I saw a data breach changing user behavior was with LastPass scandal last year. Unless it's literally the people's bank account passwords that's at stake, I don't think most would care at all.

I agree, regulation - either enforced by the platform or authorities - may as well be the only way.

[-] gkd@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

The sad part is that option probably gives some people the impression like “oh Facebook can’t track me now”. Even though they were pretty annoyed by it I’m sure, they are one of a handful of companies that absolutely does not need your device’s tracking token to still track you.

Facebook have got data breach a few times which didn't stop majority of people still using it.

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
270 points (97.9% liked)

Privacy

31609 readers
126 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS