Vivek Ramaswamy struggles to gain traction with Iowa Republicans as critics question his path ahead (apnews.com)

submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ten minutes before Vivek Ramaswamy was to take the stage in a dated casino hotel in western Iowa, no one was in the conference room except for two staffers from the Iowa GOP, which organized the event, and a group of journalists.

Guests started trickling in at the time the event was scheduled. By the time Ramaswamy began his remarks an hour later, there were about 60 people.

While Ramaswamy is packing his schedule with stops across Iowa, he has failed to move up in the 2024 Republican primary race and is increasingly at risk of becoming an afterthought. He is polling in the mid to high single digits and has left critics asking what his endgame is or if he is staying in the race only to boost former President Donald Trump.

Ramaswamy is falling behind just as the GOP campaign enters the critical final weeks before the Iowa caucuses on Jan. 15. After an earlier flurry of attention, the 38-year-old biotech entrepreneur and first-time political candidate is gaining more notice for his provocations in debates than for signs that his campaign is resonating with voters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] lewdian69@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago

His skin is the wrong color to have any chance at a GOP candidacy.

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

It's possible that his intention is simply to build up enough name recognition to be an effective grifter.

That seems to be the main goal of top level Republicans today. They have access to the most gullible base of people in America, and they want whatever little remains in those people's pockets.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

I think he's aiming for a job in Trump's cabinet. He has praised Trump and Trump has held back from attacking him.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 10 months ago

Just when I think that well can't possibly give more, they manage to bleed those stones.

Then again, maybe that's why the various billionaires are starting to abandon them; must be tiring to carry a bunch of gullible, broke idiots.

[-] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 months ago

He's also a Hindu, the Republicans aren't crazy about that either I bet

[-] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

I am sad to say it, but I think Vivek is slowly coming to that same conclusion.

You see him try so hard to be an extreme candidate, but he doesn't hold a candle to Trump.

Or to the charismatic wet noodle that is Ron DeSantis.

[-] n0m4n@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Iowa is very white.

[-] lewdian69@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Correct

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023

79 points (94.4% liked)

politics

18933 readers

2747 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News