383
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Special counsel Jack Smith took a meeting with attorneys representing former President Donald Trump earlier this year and reportedly sat in stone-cold silence while they pleaded with him not to indict their client.

Politico reports that ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl's new book on Trump's post-presidential life claims that Trump lawyers Trump attorneys Todd Blanche and John Lauro met with Smith's team over the summer and gave them a list of reasons why charging Trump with crimes related to his efforts to illegally remain in power would be a mistake.

According to Karl, Smith sat through through the presentation without saying a word.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Portbane@lemmy.zip 10 points 11 months ago

Do you guys think there is still a chance that Trump gets elected again?

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 54 points 11 months ago

Don't you? If anyone doubts he has a chance, you're not scared enough.

[-] Portbane@lemmy.zip 8 points 11 months ago

Holy shit, now you really scared me 😳

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

I'm fucking terrified we're on our way to the Idiocracy 4th Reich.

[-] sock@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

the hard pill to swallow is we arent even as good as Idiocracy

at least in Idiocracy the authorities listened to the "expert" and solved the systemic issues.

[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

He's been avoiding the debates. His rallies are basically a greatest hits from 2016, even though he was president already and could have fixed those things. he's now using dictator language to dehumanize the opposition so his thugs will be more likely to use violence. All this and he's leading the Republican race. He'll run from prison because the Republicans are purely for power now and clearly won't relinquish it next time.

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 23 points 11 months ago

Yes, it's still america

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

People asked similar questions in 2016. Right up to election day.

[-] tym@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

If the results of the trials done disqualify him, then yes this is his beer hall putsch. We're about to get a dictator if we don't have a blue army voting in droves.

We should all be very afraid.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Any chance at all? Maybe. But the obvious thing I don't see many comments about is that he cannot gain supporters, only lose them.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Every single poll has him winning the general election in 2024.

[-] Portbane@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 months ago
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
383 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19043 readers
3858 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS