2
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)
Climate
1 readers
1 users here now
Discussion of global heating, Climate and related issues of mitigation. Other active communities: !climate@slrpnk.net (climate@slrpnk.net) !climatecrisis@lemmy.ml (climatecrisis@lemmy.ml) ClimateAnxietySupport - * Manage your grief.
- * Work to Empower your local community
- * Find viable technical solutions that could work within a context of systemic change General News US News Science
founded 2 years ago
I'm coming late to the party but hope I can still help. As someone already noted in this thread, the relevant metric is the EROI, the Energy Return On Investment. It is the ratio of the amount of usable energy that can be extracted from a particular energy source over the amount of energy required to extract, process, and distribute that energy source.
Naturally, a high EROI value indicates a high energy-efficient method, while a low value suggests that more energy is being invested in the energy-production process than what is gained from the produced energy.
The Journal of Petroleum Technology wrote in an article this year:
One study from 2015 says:
It's a more complex issue than it may seem at first sight, imho, as we may include other metrixs into our analyses. For exampke, if we don't account for costs (and other factors) of nuclear waste storage and disposal, the EROI might be strongly misleading. As always, I would opt for a dashboard of metrics.
thank you so much. that paper was what I was looking for which shows oil sorta dropped to a return of 10 before fracking and now that fracking is drying up its basically returned. The sorta peak oil thing.