view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
They are both so embarrassing.
Whoa, whoa, whoa! That would be a terrible waste of pudding. Make it a pool full of mud and pig shit and everyone, including them, would be happier.
Oh ohh ohh. Do they love flinging pig shit!
It's hard to imagine a more sexist reply. Well done?
They were talking specifically about these two idiots and in no way attacked women as a whole.
It is about women as a whole because it's not something someone would ever say about two male politicians who are having a fight.
Mitch v. Chuck! Let's ruuuummmbbllleee!
Mitch would just molt his skin and slither away
McCarthy vs Gaetz, the spineless vs the pedo.
Which is vastly different from wrestling in pudding...
Yes, your comparison was indeed irrelevant.
Maybe you're just ignorant of it, but Pudding Wrestling is a real thing that revolves around sexualizing women.
It would be like if they suggested a Wet T-shirt Contest, and you replied to someone calling that misogynistic by saying "It's not a gendered thing -- we have an idiom for it: Pissing Contest"
It's an entirely different thing.
Wow. That was good simile.
I would totally watch Gaetz and McCarthy settle things with a pudding wrestling match.