136
England to diverge from EU water monitoring standards
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
136 points (95.9% liked)
Europe
8332 readers
1 users here now
News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐ช๐บ
(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐ฉ๐ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
- No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
- No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.
Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
since the general meaning of the post is trivial, which you tried to sum up with this
all that remains that could be barely interesting are the names of those states.
It may be trivial, but we have to prove trivial statements often. Some people might claim regulations don't protect the waterways and only harm businesses. They'd be wrong, but it's still important to give counter-examples to them.
god I'm talking about something completely different ๐๐๐ why did you move all of this to the article's content? I swear, you answered so fast, it makes me think I'm writing to ai generated content. it may well be, since i wow post and not comment in my c9mment. il leave these like this just to see what happens
I answered quickly because I fucked up my partition on my computer and while I'm fixing that (waiting for things to scan) I've got nothing better to do. My bad. I don't understand what the rest of your comment says though.
๐๐๐