1040

According to the former president, Americans are now experiencing "a complete subversion of our political system as a payoff to major contributors."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 148 points 8 months ago

Carter, correct as usual. I am surprised to hear this though, if only because the last I heard Carter was in hospice. And that was months ago. Dude just survives.

[-] Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world 175 points 8 months ago

This is an article from 8 years ago (2015)

[-] blargerer@kbin.social 67 points 8 months ago

He is, however, still alive despite being in hospice for months.

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 31 points 8 months ago

dude is probably doing building code inspections on the place and fixing things that nobody else gets around to

[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

He's a good baseball fan actually. Finishing out the world series even though his Braves lost to the Phillies.

On that note, go Dbacks

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Which countries play in the World Series?

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

The good ones /s

[-] ForestOrca@kbin.social 48 points 8 months ago

And didn't this come from research conducted at a major university, studying what bills are passed/ enacted, and which ones fail?

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/testing-theories-of-american-politics-elites-interest-groups-and-average-citizens/62327F513959D0A304D4893B382B992B : Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens 18 September 2014

https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746 Study: US is an oligarchy, not a democracy 17 April 2014

https://act.represent.us/sign/usa-oligarchy-research-explained/ : The US is an Oligarchy? The research Explained -

https://www.vox.com/2016/5/9/11502464/gilens-page-oligarchy-study : Remember that study saying America is an oligarchy? 3 rebuttals say it's wrong. 9 May 2016
"There's only one problem: Research published since then has raised serious questions about this paper, both its finding and its analysis. This is, of course, how normal science works; some academics put a finding out there, and their peers pick it apart.

But the study has become a frequently invoked piece of evidence in debates about money in politics, and the public and political debate has not kept up with the scholarly one. And the latest scholarly critiques suggest that while the rich certainly have more political influence than the middle class, ordinary Americans still win a substantial share of the time, even when the affluent oppose them."

I'm glad to see some rebuttals, AND our democracy is definitely flawed.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

That Vox article is extremely well done. Count me among those who had heard the hyped original study, but not the rebuttals.

Still a really shitty ratio, and I even loved the original authors' responses to the rebuttals. Makes me hope they do a follow up.

So much nuance behind what is acceptable when the US is a representative democracy (supposed to assume the representative is more educated on a voting topic than we are, so maybe our opinion is not as important a factor anyway).

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

This is, of course, how normal science works; some academics put a finding out there, and their peers pick it apart.

Yeah... which means the rebuttals can be picked apart, too. I've read one of them... it doesn't actually seem all that solid to me. Can't say much about the other two.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 7 points 8 months ago

Ah, that makes more sense. I just skipped right over the date at the top of the article. Thanks.

[-] Zitronensaft@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago

This is an old article, but Carter did recently visit a peanut festival or parade of some sort. I was surprised someone in hospice was well enough to go out for a drive. The people I knew that entered hospice weren't well enough for that kind of outing except maybe the first week or so after they switched to hospice care from the regular prolong your life kind of treatment.

[-] Exatron@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Hospice care just means you're expected to die within six months the last time you were evaluated.

[-] Zitronensaft@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

It also means you no longer get any kind of medication or treatment meant to prolong your life, not even IVs for the last relative of mine who went through hospice. He pretty much just got pain pills and some vitamins for the last few months until his organs finally gave out on him.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
1040 points (97.4% liked)

politics

18065 readers
4342 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS