It's not using a computer that's the problem. The issue is that generative AI scrapes the entire internet to feed its model without compensating, or even asking, creators for using their work.
No, sparky, "terminate her pregnancy" was correct. No child is murdered by an abortion. Claiming otherwise requires profound ignorance of biology and what happens during pregnancy.
Roe was "something on the books", sunshine. Until Trump stacked the Supreme Court there wasn't a need to put anything into law.
You really don't understand what a nihilist is.
The woman who received serious burns from McDonald's overheated coffee was a victim, sparky.
They do if the coffee is as hot as McDonald's had it.
It's Space Karen's new name, and logo, for Twitter.
No, but there are things that will make this seem pleasant by comparison.
I really confused the person monitoring the self checkout on one occasion several years ago.
I paid with cash, and was supposed to get something like $2.17 back in change. The machine gave me the seventeen cents just fine, but instead of two dollar bills, I got a one and a ten.
It took a couple tries to get the worker to understand that the machine gave me too much back.
No, you really haven't. Nobody is "mutilating" trans kids, and it's because those kids can't give consent.
No, Godzilla, it needs a flared base.
How hard it is doesn't matter. If you can't compensate people for using their work, or excluding work people don't want users, you just don’t get that data.
There's plenty of stuff in the public domain.