this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2026
691 points (99.0% liked)
PC Gaming
15899 readers
666 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What other economic system do you imagine Valve is operating under?
Are you even reading my comments or are you just exhausting your dialogue options?
I explicitly said they are crawling despite capitalism.
Engage with the content of what is said and not with the straw man you want to imagine.
The content of what you're saying is "despite capitalism." But what they're doing... is just capitalism. They're not a fucking co-op forced to exist within the context of capitalism. They're a private corporation. Their founder and CEO lives on a yacht.
They are an example of capitalism going well, not some kind of counterexample to capitalism itself. In no sense are they "crawling." Again: yacht. They have a fuckton of money, and a supermajority of sales in an open market, to the point they're a de facto monopoly. Y'all need to stop implying they're doing anything besides bog-standard capitalism.
And yet they ignore the most lucrative thing in existence currently, so they ignore the profit incentive.
I never said anything about it being a counter example to capitalism.
The Steam zealots can try to deny Iit but steams Most important edge in the Market is their Network effect and first mover advantage. That's why they can afford to sleep on the technology that reduces production cost.
Again because you have missed that on multiple occasions already which is quite the achievement given the scarcity of comments:
I never said anything about it being a counter example to capitalism. So please do not pretend like I said that.
They are insanely profitable.
The fuck do you mean, "they ignore the profit incentive?" Like it's not true capitalism unless they reject everything besides money money more money all the money only money matters.
People point out that what they're doing is plainly capitalism, and you repeatedly counter, they are "crawling despite capitalism." What does that fucking mean? What are you trying to say, if not this?
I feel I've been clear in establishing, it's still capitalism, even when it's not maximally evil. No zealotry is required, to point out, they are absolutely doing shit for profit, even if that doesn't mean setting puppies on fire to fuel the torment nexus for the biggest profit you can imagine. Capitalism that's less awful than the worst examples still counts - unlike what the root comment treats as inseparable from the premise.
Capitalisms motivator is Profit
So when they are not doing everything in their Power to make a Profit, that is not true capitalism.
You cannot Just ignore the core aspect of capitalism and still claim it to be capitalism.
What the fuck is capitalism supposed to be then?
Capitalism is when Money?
Capitalism ist when trade?
Or the hilarious capitalism is when freedom?
So it's not capitalism?
I know the American schools are bad, but holy shit.
So it is capitalism.
Unfortunately i cannot make it blink in Red or make it Take on the taste of hamburgers. I dont know what an American needs to auccessfully decipher a sentanced that doesnt corralte to its programming... And to be quite honest i give up.
When you repeat yourself the, what? Third or fourth time? It is clearly an issue of differing cognitive Processing, that i am not qualified to synchronize.
Right, it's not a counter example to capitalism, we just cannot ignore the core aspect of capitalism and still claim it to be capitalism.
If a business does not do literally everything possible to make number go up, that's not true Scotsman, I mean capitalism. How could private ownership and wage labor and charging a premium for other studios' work be capitalism, and also how dare you say I claim it's not capitalism?
I am reading the words you write.
Are you?