this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2026
691 points (99.0% liked)

PC Gaming

15899 readers
666 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] derAbsender@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And yet they ignore the most lucrative thing in existence currently, so they ignore the profit incentive.

I never said anything about it being a counter example to capitalism.

The Steam zealots can try to deny Iit but steams Most important edge in the Market is their Network effect and first mover advantage. That's why they can afford to sleep on the technology that reduces production cost.

Again because you have missed that on multiple occasions already which is quite the achievement given the scarcity of comments:

I never said anything about it being a counter example to capitalism. So please do not pretend like I said that.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They are insanely profitable.

The fuck do you mean, "they ignore the profit incentive?" Like it's not true capitalism unless they reject everything besides money money more money all the money only money matters.

People point out that what they're doing is plainly capitalism, and you repeatedly counter, they are "crawling despite capitalism." What does that fucking mean? What are you trying to say, if not this?

I feel I've been clear in establishing, it's still capitalism, even when it's not maximally evil. No zealotry is required, to point out, they are absolutely doing shit for profit, even if that doesn't mean setting puppies on fire to fuel the torment nexus for the biggest profit you can imagine. Capitalism that's less awful than the worst examples still counts - unlike what the root comment treats as inseparable from the premise.

[–] derAbsender@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Capitalisms motivator is Profit

So when they are not doing everything in their Power to make a Profit, that is not true capitalism.

You cannot Just ignore the core aspect of capitalism and still claim it to be capitalism.

What the fuck is capitalism supposed to be then?

Capitalism is when Money?

Capitalism ist when trade?

Or the hilarious capitalism is when freedom?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You cannot Just ignore the core aspect of capitalism and still claim it to be capitalism.

So it's not capitalism?

[–] derAbsender@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

true capitalism

I know the American schools are bad, but holy shit.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] derAbsender@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I never said anything about it being a counter example to capitalism. So please do not pretend like I said that.

Unfortunately i cannot make it blink in Red or make it Take on the taste of hamburgers. I dont know what an American needs to auccessfully decipher a sentanced that doesnt corralte to its programming... And to be quite honest i give up.

When you repeat yourself the, what? Third or fourth time? It is clearly an issue of differing cognitive Processing, that i am not qualified to synchronize.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Right, it's not a counter example to capitalism, we just cannot ignore the core aspect of capitalism and still claim it to be capitalism.

If a business does not do literally everything possible to make number go up, that's not true Scotsman, I mean capitalism. How could private ownership and wage labor and charging a premium for other studios' work be capitalism, and also how dare you say I claim it's not capitalism?

I am reading the words you write.

Are you?