this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2026
101 points (99.0% liked)

Canada

12563 readers
601 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm no fan of Danielle Smith, but was this really a defeat for her? She hedged her position on separatism all the way along until eventually settling on the winning side before the vote. Meanwhile, although the separation question got all the media attention, she has won on most of the other questions she asked in the referendum.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

And she still won on all the racist dogwhistle questions that were part of the referendum.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

People kept making it sound like there was any question whatsoever to the outcome here.

Before question 10 was even added, I received TWO polling calls on rough versions of the questions, including question 10. Polling on Q10 specifically was consistent after it was officially added, and those results were public. Sensationalist media reporting making it sound conceivable as an outcome was completely self serving click bait.

The answer was in plain sight before it was even added.

It was a stunt. She didn't have to wait to see which was the wind was blowing, she knew how it would land before the question was even asked.

She didn't count on the depth of the stupidity of her useful idiots. She stoked a fire she expected them to applaud her for tending, regardless of the result. She's learning the lesson that if you fire up irrationality, they're loyal to the irrationality, not to you.

[–] TheSecondVariety@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

eventually settling on the winning side

Hardly... but I don't see why picking a side on anything in the referendum mattered. The referendum was to see what Albertans wanted and they told her.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Albertans said "yes" to her on 7 of the 10 questions she asked them.