this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
107 points (95.0% liked)
Fuck AI
8547 readers
1072 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
Rules:
- Relevant posts only.
- No bigotry.
- This isn't a place to talk about the cons and (supposed) pros of AI for different use cases. This is /c/fuck_ai .
- Especially no AI advocacy.
- Don't make any posts that are just AI content with no context unless the point of your post is obvious from content. (Don't just post slop advertisements or slop political cartoons. At least make your point about it clear so we know you aren't just trolling.)
- Venting is part of the purpose of this community, but don't aim frustration or accusations at other users.
- These rules are a living document that may change in the future.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
software quality has been DOWN THE GUTTER on average everywhere even fron teams who try to be thoughtful about it
Absolutely. We're still figuring all this out and it's going to take time. I believe that LLMs have a place in the software development lifecycle but where exactly that is depends largely on the project.
For example, I think that open source projects should continue to ban LLM generated code. The barrier to entry and quality of submissions is simply too low for there to be any benefit. Code review, on the other hand, might actually supply some useful findings.