this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2026
18 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
23332 readers
117 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have Luna Nguyen's book too. It's the first thing you said and that includes the second. They speak about consciousness in the classical, narrow, individual, sense in the beginning and transition to a broader meaning later. This makes sense, as they move to a different level of abstraction and explain how consciousness is situated in and arises from a material world and society.
Narrow start: p. 64:
This is the classical meaning of consciousness as an inner experience that reflects the world.
p. 79:
Here it gets a little broader.
p. 80:
That's broader still, but it logically follows from the first material definition.
You say
The answer is on page 88:
(Emphasis mine) That's an even broader level of abstraction, the dialectic is revealed.
Later in part 1 they explain the difference between ordinary and scientific consciousness which is a narrower application of the earlier term that leans more into the second definition you gave. But it arises from the earlier one.
And in part 2 they explain how you get class consciousness from that.
(I said Luna Nguyen's book, but really it's a work of many authors. Luna contributed the translation, annotation and illustration)