this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2026
447 points (97.9% liked)

PC Gaming

15708 readers
709 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Without any flashy marketing campaigns or social media fanfare, Valve rolled out a routine Steam Client update containing a very simple line in the patch notes: “Improved Steam Client startup performance.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

As Steam has been extremely slow to launch for quite some time now, anybody want to take a stab at why it took an Epic Games taunt for them to take care of it?

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From what others said, this has been in the beta. Epic tried to beat this release just to be able to technically say they were faster for a day.

[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Ah. So there you go. And it will go down in history written in stone and people will still be talking about it 100 years from now

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Has it? I never noticed. It always been fast for me. 2 seconds is too long?

[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Maybe it's because I'm opted into the beta, so I'm always downloading updates. But it always takes a couple of minutes to launch from scratch for me and my gaming PC is no slouch.

But once I launch it, I leave it up, I never close it, so it's never just running in the background waiting for me to pop it up again.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could be you have it set to start up when you boot your computer, as it's pretty quick to "launch" when it's actually already running but hidden in the system tray. I have it set to be manually launched on mine and yeah 10 seconds sounds about right for what I'm used to (haven't restarted since the update).

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

No I don't like it running in the background and It isn't set to start on boot. It bugs me when steam is running and I am not using it.

Linux user, so no I don't hide it in a system tray.

I think there is a clue here though: Linux does drive cache a lot. Possible that is why.

For me it regularly takes (took? haven't used Steam after the update) 15+ seconds

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You think they only waited for epic to drop an update as if they monitor them from the inside?

That's a next level conspiracy theory lol

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The market leader being lazy is not a conspiracy theory. It is perfectly reasonable to assume that a competitor showing it can be done better motivated Steam to improve their product. That dynamic is a main reason why competition is good for the customer.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Because most people don't care.