this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026
177 points (97.8% liked)

Global News

6978 readers
224 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"These things are important now to put clearly on the record and, I believe, help voters in Germany and France understand that some of this politics is instigated via our enemies, namely Russia," media reports Burnham saying.

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://kyivindependent.com/russia-behind-britains-brexit-vote-uk-prime-minister-admits-for-first-time-2/


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

while 70%+ in all US colonies disapprove of genocidal supremacist fanatics, the rulership/media in all of them is highly supportive of Israel. The theory that Russia is behind making the west deeply hateful as a path to control them into supporting oligarchist militarism including hatred towards Russia, makes little sense, when if they had mind control powers, getting people to demand more services/prosperity through peace would be far more beneficial to Russia. Where rulers/politicians make deals with Russia that you are desperate to hate, it rarely translates into overt geopolitical sympathy towards Russia from that ruler/elite. Geopolitical submission to US/Israel is absolute. Funding is explicit/generous with observable quid pro quo results. Results that directly diminish the people in the colonies. Peace with Russia would not diminish anyone subservient to US empire. But that possibility is a made up political third rail to ensure subservience to usual foreign domination.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Your story would make sense if you assume Russia wants peace.

Russia wants war.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

absurd. since 2014, Russia pursued peace through Minsk accords. Even though nazi US empire signed it hypocritically as a delay tactic for instigating the war, the signing was an explicit admission that Ukraine had a nazi ethnic cleansing problem towards the Donbas. Russia has offered peace condition throughout special military operation. As Blinken admitted, for a war the US totally didn't force upon Russia, "it is a strategic imperative for the US to diminish Russia through continuation of this war".

The cognitive deficit level of those who support the war on Russia is extremely troubling.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

since 2014, Russia pursued peace through Minsk accords.

Sure. Give back Crimea.

[–] RedLink@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

While Russia is a capitalist power and as such has its own contradictions and reasons to resist support, Ukraine also has US backed Fascists in charge of it's military and government. So much so that the first thing they did after their coup was pass a ban on Russian language. Something that has expanded to destruction and banning of Russian literature, music, Holidays, property names, historical figures, and more. After the coup there were right wing extremists attacking ethnic Russians including the protests in eastern Ukraine. They were then recruited into the military to "de-radicalize" them. Of course this just made the violence sanctioned by the state. Shortly after the Donetsk, Luhansk sought federalization to protect themselves from Russiaphobia. Instead of respecting independent elections Ukraine bombed the hell out of them.

While yes I'm sure that Russia seeks to use Crimea and the other regions to its personal benefit. You have to realize the danger in returning Crimea, a predominantly ethnic Russian area, to a state that has weaponized and supported its fascists to ethnically cleanse Ukraine. The people support Joining Russia because it was Ukraine that said they were not Ukrainian. Not the other way around. If you look prior to the Euro-maiden you'll find many ethnically Russian areas agreed that they believed themselves to be Ukrainian. It changed because Ukraine was taken over.

It is dangerous for Russians in Ukraine, not because of Russia but because of the US and western powers funding Right wing extremists. As such, areas that are mostly ethnically Russian do not want to be ruled by the Ukrainian government anymore.

Edit: I mispoke and said that Donetsk, Luhansk declared independence when actually they still wanted to be part of Ukraine but have it federalized. Which would let them choose their own rules such as preventing the language ban and keeping Russian as a government language in the region.

Previous vers:

Shortly after the Donetsk, Luhansk declared independence to protect themselves from Russiaphobia. Instead of respecting independent elections Ukraine bombed the hell out of them.