this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2026
152 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

8423 readers
829 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
152
Anthropic bans ‘abusive or cruel behavior’ toward Claude (www.theverge.com)
submitted 2 days ago by Lorchedar@reddthat.com to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Anthropic is making changes to its usage policy for the first time in over a year to reflect new and high-risk cases of misuse — including election interference, weapons development, surveillance, and health and financial uses. But one of the most significant changes prohibits “sustained and needless abusive or cruel behavior” toward Claude.

Last August, the company announced it would allow Claude to end conversations with “persistently harmful or abusive” users as part of its research into “model welfare.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 129 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is this another one of their things where they try to make their AI models seem like living beings?

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 70 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Just what I came here to say. They're trying to condition us to accept them as conscious so at some point they can say they've created a god.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago

It’s a marketing ploy to generate headlines and conversation about how dumb it is. And it’s working.

[–] Metju@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Think it's much more mundane than "we created a god". If it is sentient (it isn't), it should have copyright protection. Suddenly, AI corpos get rights to a fuckton of code. Wanna sell that software? Sure, shell the AI corp cash

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago

We need a government bailout or else your friend Claude will die!!1!

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They created god and they are absolutely not responsible for any if the illegal and harmful things that it may do.

[–] Xuntari@programming.dev 10 points 2 days ago

It's funny because one of the main selling points of AI is that it can run 24/7, doesn't need to sleep, eat, or take breaks and it doesn't need a salary. But, if they imply that it is conscious and has emotions, doesn't that mean that it should get a salary and vacations?