this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2026
1319 points (96.9% liked)

Work Reform

17772 readers
1379 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Might be unpopular be politicians should actually be paid a lot. You want to attract actually skilled and capable people after all

But it should also be there only source of income, no speaking gigs, no stock trades, no side business

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One of the reasons a lot of government positions track if you have debts is that propensity to financial burdens make politicians more suceptible to corruption.

If you pay them less, they are actually going to be more easily bribed.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you pay them less, they are actually going to be more easily bribed.

If you keep the same people in office, then yeah. I wonder who else would be up for the job if the pay was lower. Hopefully more Mamdanis.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nah, it'll be independently wealthy trust fund kids that don't need to rely on a paycheck to pay rent, but have a trust that is valued based on policy.

Politicians should be some of the highest paid people in the country. I wouldn't get out of bed for 70k today, that was my paycheck for my first professional job. Now perhaps you don't want me as a politician, but...

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 day ago

It's also actually a means to prevent corruption unfortunately. Less likely to take ridiculous sums if you're financially solid

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’d agree with you except we see politicians selling out for even tiny amounts while having tens of millions in the bank. If you’re willing to sell the food out of the mouths of the poor for $2,500 and you’ve got 12 mil in the bank your inherently corrupt and having a big paycheck won’t change that. They have billionaire brain rot, number go up syndrome, as long as number goes up that’s all that matters no matter how much they are given or have.

[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

These people are massively advantaged with the current campaign system/rules.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

No. You see the tiny tip of the iceberg in payments. There is always a ton more beneath the surface.

[–] YouTalkinToMe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I think it is much more important what they are using that skill for.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

Live in Missouri. Our state legislature liked to for years vote down a pay raise for themselves. They made sure to stand up and wave "Look at how good we're doing."

If I wanted to run for legislature, I would have had to taken a cut in pay and I am definitely not on the top 50% of the state, much less the country.