this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2026
569 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

22654 readers
2068 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And per the school's own admission, teachers recognized her as a former student and didn't say anything at the time.

There's also many ways around metal detectors, especially when the school shows that they don't follow protocols anyway.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago

I mean a former student definitely can be a substitute teacher

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

And per the school’s own admission, teachers recognized her as a former student and didn’t say anything at the time.

If you're drawing that from:

Since our first communication, our initial investigation determined that this individual involved was a former student recognized by staff. [emphasis mine] She was not a substitute teacher. We did involve our Milwaukee Police Department school resource officers (SROs) the day that this occurred. The district’s Title IX coordinator was also notified. In addition to any police actions resulting from this situation, the district is continuing with its own investigation.

It seems extremely clear that what the letter is saying isn't that the staff saw her impersonating a substitute and looked the other way; it's that once the students reported her, staff who worked there were able to identify her as a former student.

If this isn't what you were talking about and I'm missing something, I apologize.