this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2026
536 points (98.4% liked)
Technology
88620 readers
2919 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Didn't they just start a partnership with one of the big US tech companies like 6 months ago or something?
Sam Altman or someone like that has probably got their tendrils in this guy's head...
They are the ones, Oracle will soon not be paying anymore, because of Force Majeure (techcrunch.com) ...
Eh, they're an evil company and all that, but the force majeure seems like a non-issue:
It just means if the development misses the contractual deadline, they don't have to pay until it comes on line. Seems reasonable to be honest, why should you be held to your end of the contract if the other party doesn't meet theirs?
The real problem here is a combination of: the environmental and ecological impacts of the data center, the impacts on the local communities, the ethics (or lackthereof) of AI and lack of regulatory oversight, and the surveillance state that they're using it to build.
Focusing your critique on the force majeure just kind of misses the point
It wasn't meant as a critique, sorry it sounded like that! I meant it more like idiotic statements like all of the tech morons are making right now.
The real critique with "AI" is elsewhere, as you rightly put it in your reply.
Ah, I see. I guess I didn't know where you were going with it then