News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I was initially kind of torn on this one, since I don't think a job should be able to fire you for something you do outside of work, no matter how idiotic, unless it breaks the law. Then I remembered that Republicans got a whole bunch of people fired for things they said about what's-his-name, with the neck fountain.
So I'm ultimately coming down on the side of "fuck 'em, payback's a bitch".
If you're rank and file, sure. If you're the CEO then posting something like this really brings your judgment into question.
Never seen a more beautiful fountain in my life
I got the feeling that the photo was a joke made in AI. Maybe I’m giving the CEO too much credit idk. But, if the bank has any Canadian customers, I totally understand the firing.
You can’t alienate your customer base without consequences.
It's an interesting issue, since it isn't really a freedom of speech issue since the government is not censoring this person.
Republicans cried foul in cases like these (which are not censorship) and then put in an administration that DOES do censorship.
Generally speaking, Republicans don't agree with regulations that would prevent employers from hiring or firing however they want.
Then they started stripping funding from institutions that supposedly were "DEI hiring".
So at this point they're clear that "cancel culture is only bad when Trump supporters are fired".
I have a more nuanced view, which is that if you accept a job where you are very publicly associated with the company, the employer should be able to have a clause where they specify you can be terminated for your public social media activity. Anything that isn't fully public doesn't count.
It would have to be clear that it is a condition of employment that you not get political on social media as you're accepting a C level position, etc.
If you post anonymously somewhere and that account isn't actually associated with you or your company, then that should be like a workaround for the above.
Otherwise, as long as you aren't associating your public posts WITH your company, and aren't harassing your coworkers, etc, they shouldn't be able to fire you for them.
It very much is a freedom of speech issue, it's just not a violation of US law.
Technically correct, I suppose.
If you mean lower case "freedom of speech", sure the English definition of those words would agree with you. Colloquially when most folks in the USA say "Freedom of Speech" they're not referring to the definition of English words in the phrase but rather the First Amendment to the Constitution.
So it might be a case of "freedom of speech" but its not a case of "Freedom of Speech". In either situation, it isn't a freedom from consequences of that speech.
Taking the high ground when dealing with someone who stoops low isn't a a sign of virtue, it comes off more as weakness. Not because of your restraint on the matter but because your allowing your opponent to walk all over you. This is often what Ill natured people don't understand or choose not to. If they're going to bully people using such tactics, it's justifyed to retaliate in kind.
Charlie Kirk
Yeah, that's the neck fountain I was thinking of. Thanks!
Anytime
Who? Non American here.
I have a much more vivid imagination of what idiotic things people outside of work can say and lots of it should be and is a fire-able offense even if it doesn't break the law.
Even then, its not that "you can be fired for what you say outside of work", but in the USA instead we have an extremely small list of things that we outlaw firing people for, and its a good list of protections (protected classes):
For everything else we have "at will" employment, which means you can quiet whenever you like and you can be fired whenever your employer wants to. I'll agree its got some flaws, but I would not want to add "anything legal under the first amendment" as a protected class.
For the idiot bully in the OP article, she deserved to be fired.
You can always quit work