this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
92 points (100.0% liked)

memes

23926 readers
275 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
92
submitted 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by tyra@lemmy.ml to c/memes@hexbear.net
 

Just finished Chapter 1. Now I understand why everyone recommends to start with Chapter 7 instead.

Any other recommendations for first time readers?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 16 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Recommendation is to read it at a steady pace but not as fast as you can. Read a chapter or a large section, then take a break with some related content like a lecture about the same topic. It’s good to cement the same ideas in multiple ways and not get your brain fried by reading a textbook straight through. It took me like 2 years to finish volume 1, and that was a small price to feel grounded for years afterward

Edit: personally I think it should be read sequentially though. Start with chapter 1. While Marx himself admitted the first chapter (the law of value) was not strictly necessary to understand exploitation, it’s still very useful from an expository and theoretical standpoint. And certainly you need that background to understand the more advanced stuff to later extend it to modern finance capitalism.

[–] burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, and Marx knew the first chapters would be boring as hell, and difficult to grasp, and this was one of the reasons he published the whole 1st volume together.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I finally found a specific quote I remembered where Marx talks about the necessity (or dispensability) of the first chapter. It was in the famous letter to Dr Kugelmann from July 11, 1868. Usually only an abridged version of the letter is shared, but the full text includes the following, just before the abridged version starts:

The unfortunate fellow does not see that, even if there were no chapter on “value” in my book, the analysis of the real relationships which I give would contain the proof and demonstration of the real value relation. The nonsense about the necessity of proving the concept of value arises from complete ignorance both of the subject dealt with and of the method of science.

Already in the first year of the publication of Capital, critics were accusing Marx of starting from an a priori and abstract concept of value. In this letter he totally disagrees, of course correctly.

So yes, the first chapter on value is important, but not required to understand the basic facts.

This is also why, on advice of Kugelmann and others, Marx attached an appendix on value to the first German edition.

@tyra@lemmy.ml might find that appendix useful