this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
1349 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

16757 readers
286 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)
  1. Develop railways in the USA
  2. Americans turn it into mass shooting range and terrorism site
  3. ???
  4. Trains are as uncomfortable as airplanes now
[–] dovah@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not to get full-on conspiracy here but you're assuming airport security is for your (passengers) safety. The event that led to strict airport security was that planes were used to attack corporations (World Trade Center) and the government. Trains can't get hijacked and driven into the Pentagon so no one cares. But I admit this is a bleak view.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago

Once a fella brought in a few bottles of flammable liquid and now every passenger in Europe must undergo a cavity search if their shampoo bottle is 50ml over the limit.

[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Doesn't number two work for literally anything you disagree with? Shops, hospitals, schools, bars, literally anything anywhere?

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago

I ain't really get your point.

Also America is the place where guns in schools became a problem by 1990.

Also in the USA over 20 states adopted laws explicitly prohibiting firearms in hospitals.

Also, well, you get the drift I hope.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've never even seen a weapon on a train. The worst I saw was some lady ranting about the anacondas, but she was mostly just annoying. She didn't hurt anybody.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago

It's just least popular mode of transportation.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

So why does there need to be more safety stuff on intercity rail than on a subway? Oh wait, not that they get any ideas ...

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

You could make a more effective argument for that against buses. Trains at least need to stay on a track.