Star Wars
Discussion for all things Star Wars. Movies, books, games, TV shows and more are welcome.
-
Keep it civil. Don’t insult other community members in posts or comments, and don’t make posts designed to insult other community members or parts of the fandom with different opinions.
-
Posts must be on-topic.
-
No real life politics. That means no political advocacy, and no real life political discussions vaguely dressed up as on-topic posts. If you want to discuss real life politics, you are free to start your own community.
-
No memes/low-effort spam/Youtube poops style posts. !starwarsmemes@lemmy.world is a place for those.
-
Posts must be coherent.
-
If a post is otherwise allowed but has realistic gore or nudity, please mark it NSFW.
Community icon art from DeviantArt user DavidDeb.
Banner art by Ralph McQuarrie.
view the rest of the comments
Right, but George took that away from Indiana Jones. They had him ride off into the sunset, live happily ever after, but no. He was a bankable IP and they wanted more money, despite how it would ruin the ending they already gave to the character
I'm okay with more Indiana Jones being made, because it's an adventure serial. My problem was it wasn't done well.
Lucky Luke rides off into the sunset in every movie. Doesn't mean that is the end of him.
It signals the end of the movie, not the end of the character.
You're saying someone can't end a character's story by LITERALLY having them ride off into the sunset? Kind of an odd rule.
And if you think losing a hand and watching your friend get kidnapped is a happy ending akin to "riding off into the sunset" then you just have a fundamental misunderstanding of movies in general.