this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
418 points (98.2% liked)

News

39444 readers
1618 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal appellate court ruled last week that Oregon may house trans women inmates in men’s prisons, overturning a lower court’s ruling earlier this year.

The three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals consisted exclusively of Donald Trump appointees. They voted unanimously to overturn an April ruling from U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke ordering the Oregon Department of Corrections to assume that trans women prisoners should be housed in women’s prisons, and then assess individual cases to confirm that placement, not the other way around.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How common is that, compared to dick&balls raping vagina?

Sexual assault is reported at higher rates in women's prison when compared to mens.

it'd be decided on a case by case basis, I don't know what you want of me.

By what criteria would the courts determine this on a case by case basis?

I'm trying to get you to realize how silly your entire premise is, and how it is neither practical nor realistic. Transphobes always believe their prejudice to be practical, but when you actually ask practical questions their beliefs fail to reflect reality.

[–] darkwing_duck@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

By what criteria would the courts determine this on a case by case basis?

I have no idea. What do they do now?

how silly your entire premise is

So what's your proposal, desegregate prisons?

Sexual assault is reported at higher rates in women’s prison when compared to mens.

That's not what I asked though, is it? And what % of that is dick&balls "women" raping women? If anything, that adds to my point - segregate dick&balls from non-dick&balls.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have no idea. What do they do now?

They go by their self assigned gender.

So what's your proposal, desegregate prisons?

My personal opinion would be prison abolition for any non violent crime. My pragmatic view would to go by gender.

That's not what I asked though, is it?

I gave you answer more specific to the scenario? Your question has no pertinent application to people being held in detention.

what % of that is dick&balls "women" raping women?

What?

[–] darkwing_duck@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They go by their self assigned gender.

So essentially free-for-all? Terrific.

My personal opinion would be prison abolition for any non violent crime

What about violent crimes?

My pragmatic view would to go by gender

We've already established that gender is about as relevant as hair color.

What?

dick&balls “women” aka persons with dick&balls who claim they are women

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So essentially free-for-all? Terrific.

I know that you may be fooled, but for most people it's pretty easy to determine if someone has changed their gender for dubious benefits. It's not really a problem.

What about violent crimes?

Intense rehabilitation for the vast majority. Indefinite psychiatric care for those who cannot be rehabilitated.

We've already established that gender is about as relevant as hair color.

Some fucking moron making a stupid claim is not establishing anything other than some people are idiots.

“women” aka persons with dick&balls who claim they are women

What were you attempting to ask?

[–] darkwing_duck@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

for most people it’s pretty easy to determine if someone has changed their gender for dubious benefits

Who is in charge of making that determination?

Intense rehabilitation for the vast majority. Indefinite psychiatric care for those who cannot be rehabilitated.

Full agreement here.

Some fucking moron making a stupid claim is not establishing anything other than some people are idiots.

When one can change it on the fly, depending on feelings with zero objectivity, it's irrelevant. Side question, why are you so insistent on name-calling?

What were you attempting to ask?

How common is a woman without a functional penis raping a natural woman, compared to dick&balls owner raping vagina owner?

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who is in charge of making that determination?

If you worked to improve your reading comprehension, I'm sure you could eventually work that out yourself.

depending on feelings with zero objectivity, it's irrelevant.

There are plenty of objective ways to confirm gender identity. They do it in sports all the time.

why are you so insistent on name-calling?

You are a terrible human being, it's fun to call you a little icel wannabe cuck. See, what I'm implying is that you would love to be a cuck, but are unable too because you can't find a girl who would fuck you in the first place. See it's fun!

How common is a woman without a functional penis raping a natural woman, compared to dick&balls owner raping vagina owner?

Not going to waste my time answering something you cannot spend the effort to properly ask. That string of words looks like a LLM was fed nothing but the worst of 4chan.

[–] darkwing_duck@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you worked to improve your reading comprehension, I’m sure you could eventually work that out yourself.

"Most people" is not a good answer when incarceration is involved.

There are plenty of objective ways to confirm gender identity. They do it in sports all the time.

Do tell.

You are a terrible human being, it’s fun to call you a little icel wannabe cuck. See, what I’m implying is that you would love to be a cuck, but are unable too because you can’t find a girl who would fuck you in the first place. See it’s fun!

Have fun I guess, I'm secure enough that I don't really care, just curious.

Not going to waste my time answering something you cannot spend the effort to properly ask. That string of words looks like a LLM was fed nothing but the worst of 4chan.

Are you seriously unable to parse the query? It's not that complicated. Try reading one word at a time.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Most people" is not a good answer when incarceration is involved.

Again.... Your reading comprehension skills are showing. You should have phrased your question correctly if you were looking for a specific subject.

Do tell.

Hormone levels reflect how long you've been on hrt. Most sports require at least a year or more of hrt to compete.

Are you seriously unable to parse the query? It's not that complicated. Try reading one word at a time.

Lol, ask it like a normal person and I might read it again.